Reply to topic  [ 4865 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134 ... 325  Next
Movie news and trailers 
Author Message
Officially Mrs saspro
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Posts: 4955
Location: on the naughty step
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
TheFrenchun wrote:
Is Iron Sky worth watching?
Did you watch it then?

Mark

not yet. It's on lovefilm so probably will get round to it :)


Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:31 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
I've just been to see The Hobbit and I'm disappointed. Pretty much everything is OTT and embelished well beyond the original story. The alterations, unecessary prologue and injected humour don't add anything to what should be a more grim and desparate fantasy.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:51 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
TheFrenchun wrote:
Is Iron Sky worth watching?
Did you watch it then?

Mark


Did you watch Dredd? ;)

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:22 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12144
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
belchingmatt wrote:
The alterations, unecessary prologue and injected humour don't add anything to what should be a more grim and desparate fantasy.
So, nothing like the book then?
Did you go expecting Lord of the Rings 4, or something?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:50 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12144
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
TheFrenchun wrote:
Is Iron Sky worth watching?
Did you watch it then?
Did you watch Dredd? ;)
Yes. Really enjoyed it. There was just a couple of things that didn't work in the story for me, but they can be overlooked as they weren't really integral to the story.
And he never took his helmet off, which was a big plus for this film over the last one. (8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:54 pm
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
I just thought it was 'watchable', it didn't really do anything for me either way. Urban had Dredd down though.

The slow-mo drug was dumb I thought :?

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:19 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
belchingmatt wrote:
The alterations, unecessary prologue and injected humour don't add anything to what should be a more grim and desparate fantasy.
So, nothing like the book then?
Did you go expecting Lord of the Rings 4, or something?


It follows the book, but not enough. I went expecting The Hobbit, not LOTR, and it didn't deliver. For LOTR I enjoyed almost every minute in the cinema, and the special editions even more so (even with the blatant omissions). But The Hobbit is thin, sort of stretched, like butter scraped over too much bread. ;)

My main issue is with the injected humour. I won't spoil it here for those who haven't seen the film yet, but references to contemporary goods and activities just ruin the whole fantasy, it rips you out of the story.

Why does there have to be added and OTT comic relief? It's not to tell the story, it's to sell the story.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:19 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
belchingmatt wrote:
The alterations, unecessary prologue and injected humour don't add anything to what should be a more grim and desparate fantasy.
So, nothing like the book then?
Did you go expecting Lord of the Rings 4, or something?

Mark

I expected The Hobbit... What we got was the equivalent of Matt Damon's Bourne Identity. A rollicking adventure, which uses the name from the original, but tells a totally different story, that has nothing, or very little, to do with the book.

belchingmatt wrote:
It follows the book, but not enough. I went expecting The Hobbit, not LOTR, and it didn't deliver. For LOTR I enjoyed almost every minute in the cinema, and the special editions even more so (even with the blatant omissions). But The Hobbit is thin, sort of stretched, like butter scraped over too much bread. ;)

Agreed. Following the book, they could have made a good film, but I think they feared people wouldn't watch it, if it didn't include the characters from LOTR, so they wrote them all into the film, where they never appear in the book.

It seems, instead of making "The Hobbit", they made a prequel to LOTR.

belchingmatt wrote:
My main issue is with the injected humour. I won't spoil it here for those who haven't seen the film yet, but references to contemporary goods and activities just ruin the whole fantasy, it rips you out of the story.

I agree about the humour, there was a lot injected. Watching it in German, I didn't notice the references to contemporary goods. Can you PM me a couple of examples.

belchingmatt wrote:
Why does there have to be added and OTT comic relief? It's not to tell the story, it's to sell the story.

Because they are scared that a proper film won't pull in the audiences, that they have to add in the formulaic nonsense that they think people want. Maybe they should be brave and try and produce a proper film for a change.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:04 am
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
belchingmatt wrote:
My main issue is with the injected humour. I won't spoil it here for those who haven't seen the film yet, but references to contemporary goods and activities just ruin the whole fantasy, it rips you out of the story.

I agree about the humour, there was a lot injected. Watching it in German, I didn't notice the references to contemporary goods.

I watched it in English and didn't spot anything. I guess they went over my head :?

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:34 am
Profile WWW
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Pirates 5

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/60315

I blame the families who go to these shows, you know.

...


Arnold to possibly start shooting the next CONAN in 2013!!! Now With VIDEO!

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/60310

I must try the Conan films again, don't remember them being very good but I was a kid, so...

...


And it's not a mark of quality, but at least the next Die Hard will have an 'R' rating.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:07 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Joss Whedon updates on Avengers 2

http://www.totalfilm.com/news/joss-whed ... avengers-2

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:24 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
Posts: 10022
Reply with quote
I've just seen the new robocop suit in "full" - has some kind of visor but right hand is still "human" looking. Still all black - would have preferred a silver/black combo similar to the original.

_________________
Image
He fights for the users.


Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:33 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:

The Avengers movie I want them to make contains this, this and this.


Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:36 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
cloaked_wolf wrote:
I've just seen the new robocop suit in "full" - has some kind of visor but right hand is still "human" looking. Still all black - would have preferred a silver/black combo similar to the original.


If I had to guess, the right hand is to accommodate the somewhat CGI gun.

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:15 pm
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
jonbwfc wrote:
pcernie wrote:

The Avengers movie I want them to make contains this, this and this.


Oh, I'd guess it's already been made, just a bit cheaper and sleazier :lol:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:17 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4865 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134 ... 325  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.