View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:56 am
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
paulzolo
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm Posts: 12251
|
I am slightly disturbed by this idea. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8230504.stmAfter all, look at what Disney did to Winnie the Pooh. That’s where Spiderman is going.
|
Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:46 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
I swear to Allah, if Disney ruin the X-men... 
|
Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:48 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
'Disney' is not 'Disney' any more anyway. It was effectively eaten by Pixar a couple of years back. Have a look how much the non-Pixar Disney movies have made in the last 10 years, it's laughable. The only thing that kept the company going was the DVD resale revenue. The rest of the company was corporate fail.
As it is, it's more likely to be the people at Pixar making the next Marvel movie, not 'Disney'. Or if they've got any sense they'll farm out the properties for other people to make and actually make some money that way.
Jon
|
Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:25 pm |
|
 |
bobbdobbs
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm Posts: 5490 Location: just behind you!
|
I think you'll find the Xmen were ruined a long time ago 
_________________Finally joined Flickr
|
Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:05 am |
|
 |
gavomatic57
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm Posts: 1757 Location: Cardiff, Wales
|
Aren't Disney responsible for those daft dance movies?! I'm sure teen movies were better in my day!
_________________ G.
|
Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:43 am |
|
 |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
It's an ingenius (spelling?) move on Disney's part, it's basically a licence to print money with the licencing alone, never mind the actual profits from the likes of movies of Iron Man, Spider-man, you name it. I'd have thought that even if a film didn't make it's cost back in the cinema that it eventually does so in rentals, DVD sales and merchandising anyway. And if they can pull it off (a big 'if'), the upcoming Avengers movie - Cap. America, Hulk, Thor etc all in one film - they could be looking at something approaching Dark Knight-style takings... The irony is, I wouldn't have thought the comic book side of it is actually worth that much in the grand sceme of things at the moment, but I'd be happy to be proved wrong 
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:51 am |
|
 |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
More info here, including something I'd completely forgotten about , and Pixar's John Lasseter excited by the news, seemingly :http://www.totalfilm.com/news/disney-buys-marvel
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:52 pm |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
Their non-animated output has far exceeded animated output since at least the 1960s. They are prolific and often dire. Pirates of the Caribean is a Disney product BTW
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:35 am |
|
 |
okenobi
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:59 pm Posts: 4932 Location: Sestriere, Piemonte, Italia
|
Quite. And besides Fox did that, not Marvel. We'll see what they can manage with Wolverine 2, but I'm very, very sceptical. As long as Avi Arad and Kevin Feige are still around, all will be well.
|
Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:50 am |
|
 |
paulzolo
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm Posts: 12251
|
I’m waiting for “Wolverine And Co” a fun learning programme for the under fives teaching manners, socialisation and relationship skills with those loveable characters that the whole family can enjoy.
I wish I could draw better than I can. There is a picture in my head to go along with this.
|
Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:01 pm |
|
 |
pcernie
Legend
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm Posts: 45931 Location: Belfast
|
'Minnie Mouse has been captured and there's only one person who can save her... The Punisher!' 
_________________Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/
|
Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:33 pm |
|
 |
ProfessorF
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm Posts: 12030
|

 |  |  |  | Quote: UPDATE 8:30 AM PDT - There have been a number of developments since the initial press release about Disney’s acquisition of Marvel went out. Disney held a conference call with investors that just finished to discuss the deal and while much of it was focused on the financial aspect of the deal – with regards to both current and future opportunities – there were a number of comments concerning publishing and Marvel’s film slate that are of interest.The bullet points are: - Existing licensing and distribution deals should remain where they are.
- Disney believes there’s real opportunity with the Marvel catalog of characters and will work on where those opportunities are greatest and how best to leverage them across the existing Marvel and Disney infrastructure.
- Disney executives went to great lengths during the call to make the point that they don’t pretend to be more expert than Marvel is in handling their characters, citing the hands-off relationship Disney has had with Pixar since the acquisition of that studio. Disney said Marvel manages the properties from a business perspective very intelligently and trusts them to make the right decisions for these products for a long time to come.
- Disney said the deal was attractive not just because they’re buying great characters, stories and brand, but about working with people who know these characters best and how best to work with them in other media.
- Again, referencing the Pixar deal, Disney finds working as one company with Marvel removes friction and creates value that’s very compelling. Licensing offers very attractive opportunities, but nothing is better than being one. International expansion of Marvel properties through Disney was cited as a potential growth area.
- Cable channel Disney XD is currently running about 20 hours a week of Marvel content and Disney has been looking to license more Marvel content and this deal gives them that opportunity as well as the opportunity to expose these characters internationally
- With regards to video game publishing, Disney praised Marvel’s licensing agreements with some of the best video game producers and publishers in the business and said moving forward they will consider what’s best for each individual property as each licensing deal comes up for renewal and that there would likely be a blend of licensed and self-produced/self-distributed titles.
- With respect to Paramount’s distribution deal with Marvel and the Iron Man franchise, Disney has every intention to respect the deal that’s in place, but noted that it’s in their best interest, overtime, to become the sole distributor of Marvel films.
- Will Disney3D be used for Marvel movies? That will be determined by those who are in charge of producing Marvel’s theatrical films.
- When asked if there was potential for cross-polination between Marvel and Pixar, Disney said that Pixar’s John Lasseter has met with key Marvel creative executives recently and the group got “pretty excited, very fast.” Disney will look at all opportunities and thinks there are some exciting product that could come from this sort of partnership.
- Disney said this deal is expected to benefit Marvel’s retail efforts, being able to leverage Disney’s shelf space and relationships with major chains and distributors.
- The deal began when Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger reached out to Marvel Chief Executive Ike Perlmutter earlier this year. Again, Disney noted that they believe in the creative team at Marvel and see no reason to upset that applecart.
- Disney has not made any real estate decisions and sees no reason to move Marvel Studios from their headquarters in Manhattan Beach, California. No mention of Marvel Publishing’s offices in New York City was made.
In addition, Marvel Editor-In-Chief Joe Quesada has been twittering this morning and has made some comments on the deal: “G' morning, Marvel U! Welcome to this moment in history. Everyone relax, this is incredible news and all is well in the Marvel U.” “Everybody take a deep breath, all your favorite comics remain unchanged and Tom Brevoort remains grouchy.” “If you're familiar with the Disney/Pixar relationship, then you'll understand why this is a new dawn for Marvel and the comics industry.” |  |  |  |  |
Source
|
Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:14 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|