Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Call to ban child-in-car smoking 
Author Message
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Reply with quote
I think they should just ban the transportation of children in cars....I wonder how many accidents they cause by distracting their parents... ;)

_________________
G.


Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:49 am
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 1899
Reply with quote
Well one mother nearly ran me over on a zebra crossing as she was looking behind her shouting at her children.

_________________
Image

My Flickr Page

Now with added ball and chain.


Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:54 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
DaftFunk wrote:
I was wondering who would say this, so you advocate the legalisation of glue sniffing? cocaine? heroin?

If I were to go climbing mountains the object is not to kill myself but that's all smoking does.


Because legislation stops people doing it now? All prohibition does is drive it underground and fund organised crime. The object of smoking is not to kill oneself, it has long been an accepted social activity in this Country. I will remind you sir, that illicit drugs were once perfectly legal in this Country.

ProfessorF wrote:
Uhm, for the same reasons we have laws about not putting some bad things in food. Like the minimum requirement for things to be fit for human consumption.
Stops people from dying and stuff.


People expect food to be safe and wholesome, and even then there are plenty of foods that are unhealthy or are even carcinogens. These are perfectly legal. People are made fully aware of the risks of smoking, if they wish to take the risk then that's their decision. You have no right to make that determination for them.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:57 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
People expect food to be safe and wholesome, and even then there are plenty of foods that are unhealthy or are even carcinogens. These are perfectly legal. People are made fully aware of the risks of smoking, if they wish to take the risk then that's their decision. You have no right to make that determination for them.


I do when it affects other people. I'm an ex-smoker, and I fully appreciate that if I choose to smoke, then I should it away from other people who choose not to.
When I eat it affects my body, not that of my children (unless I was a breastfeeding mother, which I'm not) or anyone else I'm smoking around.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:01 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
This is down to common sense again, isn't it? A good parent must know that smoking is bad for them, and bad for their offspring. Therefore, they should be able to curtail the habit in confined spaces, like the car.

I don't think we should legislate for bad parenting, should we?

On the other hand...

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:03 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
People expect food to be safe and wholesome, and even then there are plenty of foods that are unhealthy or are even carcinogens. These are perfectly legal. People are made fully aware of the risks of smoking, if they wish to take the risk then that's their decision. You have no right to make that determination for them.


I do when it affects other people. I'm an ex-smoker, and I fully appreciate that if I choose to smoke, then I should it away from other people who choose not to.
When I eat it affects my body, not that of my children (unless I was a breastfeeding mother, which I'm not) or anyone else I'm smoking around.


Sure when it affects other people then I completely agree. But no-one has the right, not even Nanny (i.e. the British government) to tell an adult whether or not they can smoke and what they can do in their own home.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:05 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
whether or not they can smoke and what they can do in their own home.


Not even when it directly affects the health of their children? Do the children have a say in this?

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:09 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
Sure when it affects other people then I completely agree. But no-one has the right, not even Nanny (i.e. the British government) to tell an adult whether or not they can smoke and what they can do in their own home.


So, smoking at home in front of the kids is ok?
As Heather says, that's a call on responsible parenting first and foremost.

There is, however, no denying that smoking is primarily a vast waste of money, bad for your health, and makes you smell bad.
If people were paying to roll in [LIFTED] in public, then wipe it on passers by, would you want that to be outlawed?
Or is it their right as a 'responsible adult'?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:13 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am
Posts: 7011
Location: Wiltshire
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Not even when it directly affects the health of their children? Do the children have a say in this?


Same argument applies to parent speeding, driving over the limit, not putting child or them selves in seat belts, not changing the car tyres when worn down etc etc etc etc etc

So I propose an easy solution don't have children Simple. :D

_________________
<input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />


Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:15 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
AlunD wrote:
So I propose an easy solution don't have children Simple. :D


That's one solution.

It's parenting that's at fault here. Lack of skills and awareness seems to be the problem. The selfish society.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:17 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm
Posts: 8603
Location: location, location
Reply with quote
Any decent parent wouldn't smoke in the same car or room/house as a child anyway.

_________________
Support X404, use our Amazon link
Get your X404 tat here
jonlumb wrote:
I've only ever done it with a chicken so far, but if required I wouldn't have any problems doing it with other animals at all.


Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:10 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5157
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
I wouldn't care if smoking was banned. I smoke about once a month, less so this year.

Unfortunately, taking away rights is what the world does when someone gets put above everyone else. You can't take drugs, you can talk about or research certain things to fulfill personal curiosity...

Would the country be a bad place without smoking? Probably no better or worse than it is now, people would be angry and irritated for a bit, but that would soon change...

If you've got a kid, you shouldn't be allowed to smoke around them, or drink excessively while they are in your care, or a great many other things...We should be saying "it shouldn't be allowed", we should be saying "be a sensible parent".


Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:13 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
I agree that it is common sense that you don't smoke in a house or car if there are children there (or regularly visiting). The problem is that sort of sense is increasingly less common these days, which is why a lot of things end up being legislated against.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:20 pm
Profile ICQ
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
Sure when it affects other people then I completely agree. But no-one has the right, not even Nanny (i.e. the British government) to tell an adult whether or not they can smoke and what they can do in their own home.


So, smoking at home in front of the kids is ok?
As Heather says, that's a call on responsible parenting first and foremost.

There is, however, no denying that smoking is primarily a vast waste of money, bad for your health, and makes you smell bad.
If people were paying to roll in [LIFTED] in public, then wipe it on passers by, would you want that to be outlawed?
Or is it their right as a 'responsible adult'?


Wiping [LIFTED] on someone is a tad different to smoking out in public. If you're going to start policing what people do in their own homes then we start on a VERY slippery slope. If the conditions of the house are detrimental to the health of the children then Social Services will become involved, simplez.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:22 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Linux_User wrote:
Wiping [LIFTED] on someone is a tad different to smoking out in public.

Not really, both leave a disgusting smell in your clothes and on your skin, leave you feeling dirty and needing a shower... :?

The plus side with [LIFTED] is that I am not allergic to it and won't have a coughing fit...

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:58 pm
Profile ICQ
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.