Author |
Message |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
And yes I just checked it is to roll out win XP as the new desk top 
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Wed May 20, 2009 10:54 am |
|
 |
saspro
Site Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:53 pm Posts: 8603 Location: location, location
|
Ooohh, that could be fun.
|
Wed May 20, 2009 10:55 am |
|
 |
big_D
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm Posts: 10691 Location: Bramsche
|
Sounds familiar. I worked on one site, which rolled out Windows 95 in 2001! They are probably still umming and ahhing over Windows 2000 or XP 
_________________ "Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari
Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246
|
Wed May 20, 2009 11:00 am |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Wed May 20, 2009 11:02 am |
|
 |
Fogmeister
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm Posts: 6580 Location: Getting there
|
Just last year I finished rolling out XP to the company depots. Some of the machines were still running Windows 95  We're now looking at upgrading to Windows 7 
|
Wed May 20, 2009 11:53 am |
|
 |
forquare1
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm Posts: 5155 Location: /dev/tty0
|
We run our Sun Ray servers on all the latest software without testing (latest OS + latest Sun Ray server version) and we get hit more times than we care to mention...Our users know that this is a the case, and they know they have the company alternative (stable release of the OS and an older version of the Sun Ray software), the company alternative is slow and old, ours is fast and new...
If the company upgraded as often as we did, people would have to log off once every two weeks, when they logged back on something might not work, etc...
I see how upgrading effects users on a monthly basis, I can fully understand why companies take so long to test before they upgrade.
|
Wed May 20, 2009 12:02 pm |
|
 |
John_Vella
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am Posts: 7935 Location: Manchester.
|
I spen a few years doing XP rollouts for various companies and it usually is lots of fun. 
_________________John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker  Sorry  I'll behave now. Promise 
|
Wed May 20, 2009 12:06 pm |
|
 |
AlunD
Site Admin
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:12 am Posts: 7011 Location: Wiltshire
|
Point taken but this has nothing to do with testing, believe me. It's down to a combination of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" and "What would the benefit be?" and the "impact on other systems". I know of one central government department that hasn't upgraded OS or browser for years because they were too scared ( I can understand why to ) to upgrade their EDRMS. Which couldn't be made to work on anything newer that their current OS and browser.
_________________ <input type="pickmeup" name="coffee" value="espresso" />
|
Wed May 20, 2009 12:07 pm |
|
|