Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Transformers 2 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Yep, I agree with that Prof.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:56 am
Profile ICQ
Has a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 99
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
DoubleTouch wrote:
I agree totally. If this sells well it is because people like watching things blow up. Appealing to peoples base instincts, fire for example still resonating through humans due to the threat it had to early civilizations, is nothing new. However, one does have to be careful when you go down the "well this was all I was expecting" root of criticism as it lowers your expectations of future films.


I disagree. It is all I expect from Michael Bay; I have different expectations of Sam Mendes or Frank Oz. If I pick up a John Grisham/Jilly Cooper novel in an airport, I'm not expecting to read the work of Sartre or Descartes. It doesn't mean that the next time I read a novel, all I'm expecting is the same level of writing. I'll take Louis De Bernieres over Andy McNab any day of the week.

veato wrote:
Then they're in the wrong cinema. Transformers is never going to give you that. It is a film based on an 80's cartoon about giant robots fighting a war on Earth. I mean come on....


Exactly.
The cinema is a broad church. There is room for the big-fiery-smashy-CGI spectacle and the warm'n'fuzzy-nature-of-humanity titles. In fact, you could argue that without the big spectacle, then the smaller art films don't get financed. It's a business, and without bums on seats witnessing spectacle, then a lot of the smaller stuff can't be financed.
I spent too long in university with cinema snobs. Yes, I enjoyed Jacques Tati, but I also think John Hughes is awesome. There is ample room for both.


I think out of all of us you have summated the issues in play here the best. On reflection, maybe critics were expecting too much from this type of film. However, I still cannot help feel that these two spheres of cinema are getting progressively more fragmented, with Art House at one end and Blockbuster at the other, and that is a damaging and negative trend.

Gladiator is a good example of a type of film that bucked this. This was a Blockbuster that contained awesome CGI (for the time), loads of fantastic spectacle and epic fights, but also beautifully realised characters, solid plot and motivation, excellent direction and cinematography, excellent narrative arch and raised issues that mirrored our society (as after-all, does not art mirror reality?).

I agree that when I pick up media (of any form) I am not expecting the same experience with the same questions asked (that would be preposterous and negate the central tenet of art itself), however, how does society then rate art if it should only ever stand on its own, isolated from anything that came before it or after? If that is, if art can actually be rated at all?

There is without doubt room for all types of movies in the "church" of cinema, even Transformers, which as I showed in my first post when I linked in to Empire's Blog, often has more depth than people give credit (even if it is humorous depth). But when you isolate art through a priori judgements, you leave it in a vacuum where it is untouchable, often causing damage to it.

_________________
God knows who they begin to take themselves for - for gods, at the least


Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:33 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
I thourougly enjoyed both films, people who go along with other peoples opinions are just silly ;)

_________________
Image


Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:44 am
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: Here Abouts
Reply with quote
Finally get to see it this weekend.

There isn't any imagery for how excited I am :D

_________________
The Official "Saucy Minx" ;)

This above all: To Thine Own Self Be True

"Red sky at night, Shepherds Delight"..Which is a bit like Shepherds Pie, but with whipped topping instead of mashed potato.


Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:20 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Zippy wrote:
There isn't any imagery for how excited I am :D


:D
Enjoy.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:24 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: Here Abouts
Reply with quote
OMFG

That film was totally AWESOME :D

It had everything I could want from a Transformers movie and then sooooo much more. 'Splosions by the score, Massive Robots, it poked fun at itself a little bit and .... Well .... Megan Fox really. My Mister had some pedant issues with the geography of the last big fight scene, but otherwise we are in agreement...

AweSome

_________________
The Official "Saucy Minx" ;)

This above all: To Thine Own Self Be True

"Red sky at night, Shepherds Delight"..Which is a bit like Shepherds Pie, but with whipped topping instead of mashed potato.


Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:27 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Zippy wrote:

AweSome


:D I know! Innit great?!

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:45 am
Profile
Legend

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 45931
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Zippy wrote:

AweSome


:D I know! Innit great?!


I'm sorry peeps, but that movie was just awful, and I accepted and liked the first one despite it having little plot or script...

I'll post a proper 'review' in that thread when I can, but this movie felt like that brain-freeze you get when you eat ice cream too quickly :cry:

_________________
Plain English advice on everything money, purchase and service related:

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/


Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:05 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
pcernie wrote:
I'm sorry peeps, but that movie was just awful, and I accepted and liked the first one despite it having little plot or script...

I'll post a proper 'review' in that thread when I can, but this movie felt like that brain-freeze you get when you eat ice cream too quickly :cry:


That's ok, we're all allowed to have the wrong opinion. ;)

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:21 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
That's ok, we're all allowed to have the wrong opinion. ;)
As you have proved time and time again in this thread already. (8+p

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:32 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: Here Abouts
Reply with quote
I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it Ern, you're entitled to have a different opinon, the world would be a pretty boring place if we all agreed all of the time. I'm quite sure you think some films are fantastic that I think stink like a big pair of pig pants, it doesn't make either of us wrong, it just means we don't have the same taste.

I'll be interested in your review :)

_________________
The Official "Saucy Minx" ;)

This above all: To Thine Own Self Be True

"Red sky at night, Shepherds Delight"..Which is a bit like Shepherds Pie, but with whipped topping instead of mashed potato.


Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:32 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
My only criticism is that this film should have been the 'Empire Strikes Back' one.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:37 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 5071
Location: Manchester
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
My only criticism is that this film should have been the 'Empire Strikes Back' one.



Slightly worse than the original but with better action scenes?


Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:39 pm
Profile
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:20 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: Here Abouts
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
My only criticism is that this film should have been the 'Empire Strikes Back' one.


My only criticism is that they wouldn't allow "firey, independent" Michaela to run anywhere without being towed by the hand!!! People can run much faster and with much more control if they can pump with both their arms, holding hands while running is a sure-fire way to lose your balance and end up dead.

Oh, and the geography thing, but we won't go into that :D

_________________
The Official "Saucy Minx" ;)

This above all: To Thine Own Self Be True

"Red sky at night, Shepherds Delight"..Which is a bit like Shepherds Pie, but with whipped topping instead of mashed potato.


Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:42 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
leeds_manc wrote:
Slightly worse than the original but with better action scenes?


More in the way the film ends. I can't really go into it without big spoilers, but suffice to say, the films ends the wrong way, IMHO.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sun Jun 28, 2009 1:54 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.