Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Child Maintenance dilemma 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Dude, WTF are you posting this here for?
Go to CAB and get proper advice from them on what you should be entitled to do.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:48 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
Dude, WTF are you posting this here for?
Go to CAB and get proper advice from them on what you should be entitled to do.

Mark


Good advice, but what is wrong with talking to friends and compatriots to help get things straightened out in his mind first? He probably has a lot more sensible questions to ask and avenues to pursue.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:08 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: behind the sofa
Reply with quote
How comfortably off are you? Are you struggling to make payments? What would the terms be if it went to the CSA?

https://secureonline.dwp.gov.uk/csa/v2/ ... enance.asp

I like the idea of giving some of the cash directly as an allowance, but I'm not sure any 12 year old should be given the responsibility of looking after their own allowance when it comes to bed, board and essential clothing. I don't know what pocket money rates are these days, but something around £20 a month wouldn't seem out of proportion. That's a CD or nice clothes every week or two, which I'd consider quite a luxury.

There is a potential problem regarding her half-siblings though. How are they going to feel if their half-sister is independently "rich"?

I'm actually a little puzzled that a parent who remarries is still receiving child benefits from the ex-partner. My step father supported me 100% with no financial help from my biological father, but I guess things were different in the 70s. Assuming they have a reasonable income, shouldn't they actually be paying you since you have her more than half the year?

_________________
jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly."

When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net


Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:40 pm
Profile WWW
Spends far too much time on here
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:36 pm
Posts: 3527
Location: Portsmouth
Reply with quote
JJ, I'd say (at significant risk of being labelled as sexist, which I don't consider myself to be) that it's because the system favours women.

_________________
Image


Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:49 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:35 pm
Posts: 1657
Location: Ipswich
Reply with quote
saspro wrote:
Child maintanance is a legal requirement to cover the childs upbringing (food, bills etc) it doesn't cover extras like fancy clothes etc. (but would cover school uniforms etc).
Your daughter is enjoying the fact you'll spend money on her (who wouldn't) and enjoys spending time with you and having your attention.

For the rest.

School dinners should be covered by the maintenance(sp) but meals she has with you are taken as a given but if you're looking after her for over 50% of the week I'd be looking at an adjustment of terms (as your payments were based on different access rights).

If you need it I've got a very good legal friend who'd be able to look over your situation (without predjudice)


Cheers Saspro for your thoughts and offer, hopefully I wont need to go down the legal route of intitlement as so far I've managed to avoid that route but if I struggle to work it out with the ex in a civalized way it way be a option.

I maybe wrong in thinking this but as far as I can see my ex is half responsible of my daughters upbringing, so she should buy and provide half too.

To be honest I'd be more than happy to have my daughter live with me.

timark_uk wrote:
Dude, WTF are you posting this here for?
Go to CAB and get proper advice from them on what you should be entitled to do.


Mark, I understand what you’re saying but really I just wanted to hear the thoughts of the forum, I have known a lot of you for over 6 years now and value your opinions.

JJW009 wrote:
I'm actually a little puzzled that a parent who remarries is still receiving child benefits from the ex-partner. My step father supported me 100% with no financial help from my biological father, but I guess things were different in the 70s. Assuming they have a reasonable income, shouldn't they actually be paying you since you have her more than half the year?


Understood but I wouldn't dream of not paying towards my daughter, my EX did leave me for the man she is now married too and I know for a fact he has a grown up daughter and he never helped to bring her up physically or financially.

Nick wrote:
JJ, I'd say (at significant risk of being labelled as sexist, which I don't consider myself to be) that it's because the system favours women.


Its not a sexist remark Nick it's fact, ask the Fathers for Justice! but what I have read and heard from friends and people in the same situation is that the CSA are becoming more factual and do take into consideration overnights stays, additional children in the household whether they are blood related or not etc etc, I just hear that it's a nightmare to sort out with form and constant phone calls and when it goes wrong, it goes wrong big style. Plus they like to take their big cut for all their hard work……

_________________
www.youtube.com/hyperviper34


Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:16 am
Profile
Official forum cat lady
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:04 am
Posts: 11039
Location: London
Reply with quote
JJW009 wrote:
I like the idea of giving some of the cash directly as an allowance, but I'm not sure any 12 year old should be given the responsibility of looking after their own allowance when it comes to bed, board and essential clothing.


The money went straight to me from that age and it was paid in to a bank account I couldn't access easily (I had to go in to the branch to draw cash out) so I had to have a good reason to get the money. My mother supervised and helped me and I think it can be a good thing for the child. I had to buy my own toiletries and other essentials as soon as I started receiving the maintenance money as well as clothing. If I wanted to buy anything like records that came out of my pocket money.

12 may sound young but as they say kids grow up fast these days.

_________________
Still the official cheeky one ;)

jonbwfc wrote:
Caz is correct though


Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:58 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.