Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Psystar files for bankruptcy likely delaying Apple case 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
clicky

Quote:
The voluntary petition for bankruptcy [PDF] was filed last Thursday in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, indicating that Psystar is more than $259,000 in debt. The MacObserver, speculates that this may be an indication that the company's financial backers may have pulled out under the belief that Apple will inevitably prevail in the lawsuit against the unauthorized clone maker.


Thus endeth another chapter with Apple secure in the knowledge that its EULA is still in effect and safe from a court going "oi! hang on one moment..."
I personally would of like this to have gone all the way and get the question of whether the EULA and tying the OS to the hardware is legal once and for all. It would of stopped many a flame war.

Quote:
For its part, Apple has also said in court documents that it believes Psystar may be part of a larger conspiracy and is seeking to uncover unknown parties who may be secretly backing the clone maker, either financially or otherwise, in its efforts to disrupt Apple's stronghold on Mac hardware sales.

Now that would of been funny if the backers turned out to be Dell; HP et al :lol: WHeres Mulder and Scully when you need them "the OSX files" :lol: :lol:

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Wed May 27, 2009 7:26 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
bobbdobbs wrote:
clicky

Quote:
The voluntary petition for bankruptcy [PDF] was filed last Thursday in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, indicating that Psystar is more than $259,000 in debt. The MacObserver, speculates that this may be an indication that the company's financial backers may have pulled out under the belief that Apple will inevitably prevail in the lawsuit against the unauthorized clone maker.


Thus endeth another chapter with Apple secure in the knowledge that its EULA is still in effect and safe from a court going "oi! hang on one moment..."
I personally would of like this to have gone all the way and get the question of whether the EULA and tying the OS to the hardware is legal once and for all.


In the USA. Has this been tested in Europe?

Two start ups - one in Russia, one in the UK could well test that if funds hold out.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2347470,00.asp

http://www.freedompc.co.uk/index.php?op ... 2&Itemid=2

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed May 27, 2009 8:33 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 5150
Location: /dev/tty0
Reply with quote
bobbdobbs wrote:
I personally would of like this to have gone all the way and get the question of whether the EULA and tying the OS to the hardware is legal once and for all. It would of stopped many a flame war.


It strikes me as odd why it wouldn't be legal...


Wed May 27, 2009 9:29 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
forquare1 wrote:
bobbdobbs wrote:
I personally would of like this to have gone all the way and get the question of whether the EULA and tying the OS to the hardware is legal once and for all. It would of stopped many a flame war.


It strikes me as odd why it wouldn't be legal...

Companies constanly try and stretch the law to suit them and every now and again they get caught (MS & Intel). Sometimes it would be nice if the arguments could be heard and a a definative ruling made. Otherwise its just a load of people having an opinion.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Wed May 27, 2009 9:47 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
If Apple lost the case, would the ruling therefore be applicable to Sony, Nintendo et al?

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Wed May 27, 2009 9:48 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 5490
Location: just behind you!
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
If Apple lost the case, would the ruling therefore be applicable to Sony, Nintendo et al?


Thats a good question. Exactly how far can companies go to restrict the end user?
The companies concerned would want to restrict the user as much as possible.
Whether this is through EULA's, patents, traddemarks or just outright bullying.

We can all ready see that in the case of the music industry the last thing on there mind is there customers. which seems to be an odd way of doing business.

_________________
johnwbfc wrote:
I care not which way round it is as long as at some point some sort of semi-naked wrestling is involved.

Amnesia10 wrote:
Yes but the opportunity to legally kill someone with a giant dildo does not happen every day.

Finally joined Flickr


Wed May 27, 2009 9:53 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
bobbdobbs wrote:
ProfessorF wrote:
If Apple lost the case, would the ruling therefore be applicable to Sony, Nintendo et al?


Thats a good question. Exactly how far can companies go to restrict the end user?
The companies concerned would want to restrict the user as much as possible.
Whether this is through EULA's, patents, traddemarks or just outright bullying.

We can all ready see that in the case of the music industry the last thing on there mind is there customers. which seems to be an odd way of doing business.


It would be a logistical nightmare too - the company would either have t change the EULA per territory (which they probably do at times), or even revise software or hardware to allow the system to install (or not) on varying levels of hardware.

The solution would be to allow it, but not to support it.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed May 27, 2009 10:49 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 7173
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
bobbdobbs wrote:
ProfessorF wrote:
If Apple lost the case, would the ruling therefore be applicable to Sony, Nintendo et al?


Thats a good question. Exactly how far can companies go to restrict the end user?
The companies concerned would want to restrict the user as much as possible.
Whether this is through EULA's, patents, traddemarks or just outright bullying.

We can all ready see that in the case of the music industry the last thing on there mind is there customers. which seems to be an odd way of doing business.


It would be a logistical nightmare too - the company would either have t change the EULA per territory (which they probably do at times), or even revise software or hardware to allow the system to install (or not) on varying levels of hardware.

The solution would be to allow it, but not to support it.


The EULA should be changed for each Country anyway, in order to account for legal restrictions and requirements in those countries. Half the crap in EULAs which are enforceable in the 'States would never cut it in a European court.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
That's your problem. You need Linux. That'll fix all your problems.
Mark


Wed May 27, 2009 10:52 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Apple don't need a EULA in Germany! :lol:

If the complete EULA isn't available to read before you purchase the product, it cannot be enforced. As Apple put the EULA inside the box and then wrap the box in plastic film, the user cannot agree to the EULA before purchase, therefore they cannot be held to any "additional" terms which they are shown after purchase...

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed May 27, 2009 10:57 am
Profile ICQ
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
big_D wrote:
Apple don't need a EULA in Germany! :lol:

If the complete EULA isn't available to read before you purchase the product, it cannot be enforced. As Apple put the EULA inside the box and then wrap the box in plastic film, the user cannot agree to the EULA before purchase, therefore they cannot be held to any "additional" terms which they are shown after purchase...



So no available on the German Apple Website? Can you ask in the store to see the EULA before you buy?

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Wed May 27, 2009 11:18 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
So no available on the German Apple Website? Can you ask in the store to see the EULA before you buy?

No idea. You generally can't call up the Apple website at the point of sale... :?

The EULA is only available inside the packaging. The reseller won't open the package until you've paid for it. Catch 22...

Apple certainly don't provide retailers with a copy of the EULA to show customers.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed May 27, 2009 11:47 am
Profile ICQ
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 3:39 pm
Posts: 478
Location: Peterborough
Reply with quote
This is such a shame, there's nothing I like more than little companies sticking up for what they believe in.

Unfortunately there's little chance against corporations such as Apple, with the weight of their legal team against you it was inevitable.

_________________
Image


Wed May 27, 2009 12:58 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 176
Reply with quote
Many believe Psystar is simply a fabricated company used by Apple as a demonstration of how difficult it would be to do something similar. However Apple would not stand a chance in court in places like Germany, they don't take kindly to American firms thinking they own Europe. Just ask Microsoft or Intel.

When journalists have tried to order from Psystar, they had little success. Their premises doesn't even exist.

http://gizmodo.com/380488/psystar-expos ... ike-a-hoax


Wed May 27, 2009 3:14 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 176
Reply with quote
DaftFunk wrote:
This is such a shame, there's nothing I like more than little companies sticking up for what they believe in.

Unfortunately there's little chance against corporations such as Apple, with the weight of their legal team against you it was inevitable.


Most of the Psystar machines are crap spec or old spec thus re-inforcing the myth that Apple use newer and better components than a 'pee-cee'.

Anyone daft enough to even consider a clone and know what the spec is, and configure it, would be better to build one themselves !


Wed May 27, 2009 3:15 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:58 am
Posts: 188
Reply with quote
monkeyphonix wrote:
Many believe Psystar is simply a fabricated company used by Apple as a demonstration of how difficult it would be to do something similar.


Many also believe in creationism, but that doesn't mean they're right.

But I do love a good wingnut conspiracy. Did you know that JFK was assassinated by Martians working for the KGB who were in the pay of Nigerian phishers who were just a front for a secret Italian society that knew the secret to perpetual energy and worshiped Dan Brown. Or something like that.

The truth is out there.


Wed May 27, 2009 3:40 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 172 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.