Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Rock Legend Brian May Slams Photog for Protecting Copyright 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Quote:
Image
Queen lead guitarist Brian May is lashing out at a photographer after she reported his copyright infringement to Instagram and got his account temporarily disabled.

In an Instagram post yesterday, May shared a screenshot of the Copyright Violation notice sent to him by Instagram after a photographer named Barbara Kremer reported that May had published one of her photos of him without permission.

https://petapixel.com/2017/11/14/rock-l ... copyright/

He does this a lot - posting other peoples’ photos. The thing with the famous is that they play on the “fan-boi/girl” thing and hope that because they’ve chosen their image, that‘s good enough. He’s clearly not seeking permission before posting others’ photos on Instagram.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:18 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
Quote:
Back in 2012, May also co-signed a letter written to Britain’s prime minister at the time, David Cameron, urging him to help fight online piracy.
Ouch.
You can't have it both ways, Brian.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:28 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:33 am
Posts: 667
Reply with quote
As a musician, I can see his reasoning behind his actions.

When a photographer takes photos of musicians playing live it is as much the subject matter as the skill of the photographer that makes the photo good/interesting.

Unless there has been a specific written agreement/contract beforehand, the subject of the photograph should have the right to use that photograph for free so long as the photographer is credited. Conversely the photographer must also credit the subject of the photograph. It does work both ways.

_________________
UltraSonic f***erPhonic ZombieShockin TrailerRockin BabyBoomin GaitorGroomin InterStellar LadyRaiders


Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:40 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
Unfortunately, it is the photographer who has the copyright, because it was their "skill" that made the photograph. If it was an unauthorised photo taken by a fan, I can see your argument having some value. But if it was a professional photographer, engaged to take official photos, then they belong the the photographer or the event organiser (depending on the contract).

If an artist paints you, you might be the famous subject of the painting, but he gets paid for producing the painting. The subject usually doesn't get any rights to the painting, they might get a few quid for posing, if it is a "no-name" subject.

But regardless, unless he sought the permission of the copyright holder, he doesn't have the right to post the image willy-nilly and thus infringe the creator's source of income.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:31 am
Profile ICQ
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:33 am
Posts: 667
Reply with quote
But in this case it's the other way around. Brian May is being photographed because he is famous. And because the image he is projecting from the stage is inherently photogenic.

The photographer has chosen to photograph him for those very reasons. She isn't down the Dog & Duck photographing some no-name band in their scruffy jeans and t-shirts, staring intently and their instruments while their singer fails to project beyond the end of the microphone. And of course she isn't because no matter how good a photographer she is, a boring looking band in a dull setting are never going to make interesting photographic subjects.

Certainly if I was in Brian May's position there would be no professional photography at any of my gigs unless the photographer(s) were prepared to share the copyright of the photographs taken with the subjects of the photographs.

_________________
UltraSonic f***erPhonic ZombieShockin TrailerRockin BabyBoomin GaitorGroomin InterStellar LadyRaiders


Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:32 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 10691
Location: Bramsche
Reply with quote
And that is the question, what sort of contact did they sign? Was it good concert and he prepared the contacts, or did the venue organize it? Did they buy the rights to the photographs or did they remain with the photographer?

It sounds like the rights remained with the photographer.

_________________
"Do you know what this is? Hmm? No, I can see you do not. You have that vacant look in your eyes, which says hold my head to your ear, you will hear the sea!" - Londo Molari

Executive Producer No Agenda Show 246


Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:58 pm
Profile ICQ
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
No professional photographer will give up the copyright to their images.

Brian May knows how the current copyright law works, he didn't abide by those rules in this case.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:50 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
He says he and the photographer on question have come to an understanding over the issue, and will be explains more later.

In the meantime, this is on his soapbox website:

Image

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:28 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 8 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.