x404.co.uk http://x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
The IE 7 tax http://x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=16646 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | forquare1 [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:26 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | The IE 7 tax | |||||||||
Clicky I think it's a brilliant idea! |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax |
So what is he taxing for IE6? |
Author: | Spreadie [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax |
Note to self - don't visit that site from the company laptop. ![]() It's beyond a joke - more and more sites are becoming difficult to surf via IE7, and still our IT dept does nothing. |
Author: | paulzolo [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:41 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax | |||||||||
A problem with a lot of corporates which are stuck because they relied too much on Explorer for internal functionality. I can imagine the panic when a mission critical site becomes unviewable. |
Author: | finlay666 [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:29 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax | ||||||||||||||||||
Nothing ![]()
|
Author: | Linux_User [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax |
My employer is going to standardise on IE8 over the next 12 months, I expect by then we'll be in a similar boat as we are now having IE6. ![]() |
Author: | paulzolo [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:04 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No one cares about IE6 any more. If the site breaks, then tough. |
Author: | finlay666 [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:02 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax | |||||||||
Really? Working in a company that specialises in web solutions we still find a lot of businesses still use it and require it to be compatible Unfortunately it does mean a lot of the cool stuff is reserved for better browsers (web sockets, canvas etc) |
Author: | paulzolo [ Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | The IE 7 tax |
Microsoft have abandoned it. The best solution is graceful degrading of the site. Think of e6 as a black and white TV. You can till watch modern programmes on it you just won't get the extra benefit of high definition, colour and stereo sound. The basic message is still there. No TV company produces Sd back and white rogrammes any more, but the delivery method ensures that those left behind get something. I just don't believe in busting a gut to get everything working exactly the same as it would in a more up to date browser. IE6 is the best part of a decade old. |
Author: | HeatherKay [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax |
I can't believe any company's IT department hasn't been sandbox texting newer browsers against their systems with a view to migrating. In fact, any organisation that hasn't been doing just that ought to be ashamed of themselves. Having a blanket "we only use IEx" seems utterly bewildering to me. |
Author: | cloaked_wolf [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax |
Much of the NHS systems still rely on IE6 due to integration of other software. |
Author: | timark_uk [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax |
To the original article : good! Mark |
Author: | JJW009 [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:09 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax | |||||||||
Often the internal systems were tendered and paid for years ago. Do you really want various government departments spending trillions of your money on new contracts to update things...? |
Author: | HeatherKay [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:12 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax | |||||||||
If it makes them more efficient, then a qualified yes. Justifying stasis is not the answer. It's admitting the installed system wasn't specified properly at the outset. How much does it cost to have someone in a corner of an IT department testing against new versions of stuff? |
Author: | jonbwfc [ Fri Jun 15, 2012 9:25 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The IE 7 tax | ||||||||||||||||||
Given government departments are notoriously bad at writing specifications, I'd rather they admitted the fact than not, frankly.
Given the rule of thumb that employing someone actually costs roughly twice their wages, probably between 40 and 50K a a year per project. Jon |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |