x404.co.uk
http://x404.co.uk/forum/

Not for the squeamish!
http://x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=16439		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  pcernie [ Wed May 16, 2012 10:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Not for the squeamish!
Seriously, and especially not squeamish blokes :shock: :

http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subc ... 4&cid=1303

Enjoy that Chinese prison! Actually, they might :evil:
Author:  Linux_User [ Wed May 16, 2012 10:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
Author:  cloaked_wolf [ Wed May 16, 2012 10:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
Yikes! :shock:
Author:  jonbwfc [ Wed May 16, 2012 11:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
There's a medical thing called 'urethroscopy' which is kind of similar (I'm sure CW can fill in the details). They use it for some bladder & kidney conditions. I've actually had it. The.. I can't call them 'side effects', let's call them 'after effects' - were very unpleasant, for quite a while. Yon fella has my sympathies.

Jon
Author:  JJW009 [ Wed May 16, 2012 11:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
1.2 meters is longer than any urethroscope I should imagine. Unless the guy's bladder was in his neck, that must have perforated a few things on its journey...
Author:  AlunD [ Thu May 17, 2012 5:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
:o :shock: JHC
Author:  cloaked_wolf [ Thu May 17, 2012 8:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
Yes a camera can be inserted into the penis to look at either the pipe (urethra ->urethroscopy) or the bladder (cystoscopy) but you use dilators first and LOTS of lubrication. 1.2m of anything is going to be painful. Won't necessary perforate anything - the wire may have just coiled into the bladder and embedded itself.
Author:  jonbwfc [ Thu May 17, 2012 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
cloaked_wolf wrote:
Yes a camera can be inserted into the penis to look at either the pipe (urethra ->urethroscopy) or the bladder (cystoscopy)

This was to use ultrasound to shatter a kidney stone, so it was the former I think. I was certainly glad they put me under first.

Jon
Author:  cloaked_wolf [ Thu May 17, 2012 2:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
Depends on where the kidney stone was. The camera has to go through the penis any way. The question is whether they look at the urethra (urethroscopy), the bladder (cystoscopy), or the ureters - the tubes from the kidneys to the bladder where most kidney stones are (ureteroscopy).
Author:  jonbwfc [ Thu May 17, 2012 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Not for the squeamish!
cloaked_wolf wrote:
the tubes from the kidneys to the bladder where most kidney stones are (ureteroscopy).

This one. Quite along way up apparently (i.e. it had lodged in the tube near the 'kidney end').

Jon
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/