x404.co.uk http://x404.co.uk/forum/ |
|
Titanic 2 http://x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=16369 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:33 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Titanic 2 | |||||||||
News CLICKY
The mind boggles. |
Author: | belchingmatt [ Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 |
There is a good reason ships aren't built in the typical Edwardian style today. Full height bulkheads is a given, but as soon as you put in a bulbous bow and flared bow then it ceases to be in the correct style, and you would be mad not to. |
Author: | paulzolo [ Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:51 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 | |||||||||
The Titanic is a different class of ship to the modern ships anyway. Titanic was definitely not a cruise ship. It was designed to get people across the Atlantic quickly in an era before flight. Anyway, you have to admire his unfaltering logic when questioned by journalists about it:
Mind you, I don’t think anyone made the claim that the Titanic was unsinkable in the first place. I believe that was a conceit introduced in various movies telling the story after the incident. |
Author: | ShockWaffle [ Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 |
There may be a little creative license involved in this venture. I imagine there would be little point recreating the 3rd class / steerage accommodation to compete with Ryan Air. |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 |
Ryan Air aren't transatlantic yet ![]() ![]() |
Author: | belchingmatt [ Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 |
Ryanair are fine for up to three hours, anything longer would be complete torture. |
Author: | timark_uk [ Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 |
SyFy'll be pleased. Mark |
Author: | TheFrenchun [ Tue May 01, 2012 8:45 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 | |||||||||
I haven't seen poseidon adventure for a while... |
Author: | JJW009 [ Tue May 01, 2012 9:01 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 | |||||||||
I had to beg not to watch it while staying at a friends house on the anniversary - it was on more than one channel ![]() |
Author: | timark_uk [ Wed May 02, 2012 7:47 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mark |
Author: | paulzolo [ Wed May 02, 2012 8:41 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
There are about three versions of it now. |
Author: | brataccas [ Wed May 02, 2012 8:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 |
first titanic IIRC was made right before WW1, if titanic hadnt hit an iceberg it would of probably been sunk anyway by German submarines. in WW1 german submarines blew up quite a few neutral american cruise ships, if they saw titanic a big juice target could they resist it? and so easy to hit too |
Author: | tombolt [ Wed May 02, 2012 8:53 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Titanic 2 | |||||||||
50/50 I'd say. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Olympic |
Author: | l3v1ck [ Thu May 03, 2012 7:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 |
I felt sorry for that nurse who was on the Titanic and the Britannic when they sank. |
Author: | belchingmatt [ Thu May 03, 2012 7:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Titanic 2 |
That reminds me of the Japanese man who survived the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |