x404.co.uk
http://x404.co.uk/forum/

Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
http://x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=15838		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  pcernie [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16999659

What are the NUJ and that 'media journalist' on? :o :?

Hopefully The Scum will die a horrible death like the NOTW, it's nothing but a self-serving mouthpiece to be used by the corrupt and corrupting :evil:
Author:  bobbdobbs [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
pcernie wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16999659

What are the NUJ and that 'media journalist' on? :o :?

Hopefully The Scum will die a horrible death like the NOTW, it's nothing but a self-serving mouthpiece to be used by the corrupt and corrupting :evil:

just like all the other newspapers. Better shut them all down.
Author:  lumbthelesser [ Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
Ah well... we can still live on in hope...
Author:  paulzolo [ Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:51 am ]
Post subject:  Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
Anyone wanting to see if the PayWall experiment will work long term is likely to be disappointed in the results.
Author:  Fogmeister [ Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
lumbthelesser wrote:
Signatures just distract from the content of the post and should not, therefore be used

Surely that should be "...and should, therefore, not be used."

Or even "... and should not, therefore, be used."

There's definitely a comma missing somewhere.

Now, what was the main topic?

:D
Author:  rustybucket [ Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
Fogmeister wrote:
lumbthelesser wrote:
Signatures just distract from the content of the post and should not, therefore be used

Surely that should be "...and should, therefore, not be used."

Or even "... and should not, therefore, be used."

There's definitely a comma missing somewhere.

Or one comma too many. To wit:

Signatures just distract from the content of the post and therefore should not be used
Author:  MrStevenRogers [ Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
Quote:
But some of the greatest legends in Fleet Street have been held, at least on the basis of evidence so far revealed, for simply doing their jobs as journalists on behalf of the company."


they obeyed the company orders issued by the company 'management'
the lowest form of legalised life on this planet is management ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greensl ... rt-murdoch
Author:  paulzolo [ Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
Image
Author:  l3v1ck [ Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
bobbdobbs wrote:
just like all the other newspapers.

+1
Author:  pcernie [ Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
The Guardian and Independent, for instance, are nowhere near Murdoch's 'standards'. Currently at least.
Author:  paulzolo [ Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:00 am ]
Post subject:  Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
pcernie wrote:
The Guardian and Independent, for instance, are nowhere near Murdoch's 'standards'. Currently at least.

It sells though. In bucket loads. People want the tittle-tattle, right-wing reactionary sensationalism. If anyone is to blame, ultimately it's the people who buy the papers who are funding and condoning the methods. The moral outrage s being driven by guilt in a lot of quarters.
Author:  jonbwfc [ Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
The Guardian and Independent, for instance, are nowhere near Murdoch's 'standards'. Currently at least.

It sells though. In bucket loads.

Hardly. It sells more than the others do, but all newspapers have had falling circulations for years.
Author:  bobbdobbs [ Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Sun newspaper 'will continue' says Rupert Murdoch
jonbwfc wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
pcernie wrote:
The Guardian and Independent, for instance, are nowhere near Murdoch's 'standards'. Currently at least.

It sells though. In bucket loads.

Hardly. It sells more than the others do, but all newspapers have had falling circulations for years.


Quote:
January 2012 saw an increase in circulation for The Daily Mirror, The Sun, The Daily Star and The Daily Record on figures from December 2011, according to the latest ABC figures.

The Sun was the largest monthly increase, with a rise of 8.71% to 2,751,219 average daily sales from December’s total . The Daily Mirror also recorded growth of 2.78% from 1,092,182 copies a day in December, to 1,122,563 copies in January 2012. The Daily Record rose by 0.55% to 276,003 copies and the Daily Star by 1.22% to 624,029.


still not bad and by my definition is a bucketload but your bucket may be different to mine and may be able to contain more :lol:
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/