x404.co.uk
http://x404.co.uk/forum/

Girls Aloud blog trial
http://x404.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1534		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  pcernie [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Girls Aloud blog trial
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/8124059.stm

There was no way this guy was ever gonna get convicted...
Author:  Linux_User [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
BBC News wrote:
He appeared at Newcastle Crown Court on Monday but was cleared when the prosecution offered no evidence.


Good use of public money there.
Author:  mars-bar-man [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
Linux_User wrote:
BBC News wrote:
He appeared at Newcastle Crown Court on Monday but was cleared when the prosecution offered no evidence.


Good use of public money there.


Okay, if you were going to prosecute someone, surely it would make sense to have at least some evidence with you? Or is that thinking to logically?
Author:  pcernie [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
mars-bar-man wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
BBC News wrote:
He appeared at Newcastle Crown Court on Monday but was cleared when the prosecution offered no evidence.


Good use of public money there.


Okay, if you were going to prosecute someone, surely it would make sense to have at least some evidence with you? Or is that thinking to logically?


The CPS are still working on such cases as:

Do bears sh1t in the woods?

Is the Pope a Catholic?

And

Is Gordon Brown a [LIFTED]?

;)
Author:  Linux_User [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
mars-bar-man wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
BBC News wrote:
He appeared at Newcastle Crown Court on Monday but was cleared when the prosecution offered no evidence.


Good use of public money there.


Okay, if you were going to prosecute someone, surely it would make sense to have at least some evidence with you? Or is that thinking to logically?


It's normally where they've either brought forward a prosecution just to be complete barstewards, or where their evidence is inadmissible or their case would get laughed out of Court.
Author:  mars-bar-man [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
Linux_User wrote:
It's normally where they've either brought forward a prosecution just to be complete barstewards, or where their evidence is inadmissible or their case would get laughed out of Court.

Eugh, that pisses me off!! Why would they even bother? What in the world possesses them to even think they can win? I mean, take some evidence being inadmissible, these guys are paid to do this job, really, you'd have thought they would have prepared and made sure they could us it?!
Author:  JJW009 [ Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
The IWF Nazis should go F themselves with a chainsaw. Censorship is evil. The guy lost his job because of their persecution, and it probably cost millions in lawyer feed.

For what?
Author:  Linux_User [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
mars-bar-man wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
It's normally where they've either brought forward a prosecution just to be complete barstewards, or where their evidence is inadmissible or their case would get laughed out of Court.

Eugh, that pisses me off!! Why would they even bother? What in the world possesses them to even think they can win? I mean, take some evidence being inadmissible, these guys are paid to do this job, really, you'd have thought they would have prepared and made sure they could us it?!


Lol having seen the quality of some Police Officers and other Enforcement Officers of the Crown, no, I can't say I find it surprising.
Author:  hifidelity2 [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
The other issue is that he has lost his job over this

Will the CPS compensate him
Will he be able to get it back – I bet not

The guy has probably had his life ruined due to some political prosecution
Author:  veato [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
"A former civil servant who wrote an internet article imagining the kidnap and murder of the pop group Girls Aloud"

He might be innocent but surely thats not a normal sane man
Author:  bobbdobbs [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
veato wrote:
"A former civil servant who wrote an internet article imagining the kidnap and murder of the pop group Girls Aloud"

He might be innocent but surely thats not a normal sane man

true... imagine working as a civile servant. :lol:
Author:  Linux_User [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
veato wrote:
"A former civil servant who wrote an internet article imagining the kidnap and murder of the pop group Girls Aloud"

He might be innocent but surely thats not a normal sane man


Is it much different to people writing crime/horror novels, or to those who read them?
Author:  LaptopAcidXperience [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
What's wrong with wanting Girls Aloud dead (there is a interesting philosophical question about whether you can kill something artificial) the sick bit is considering anything sexual with such a shallow bunch of talentless, vapid, plastic monstrosities.
Author:  veato [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
Linux_User wrote:
veato wrote:
"A former civil servant who wrote an internet article imagining the kidnap and murder of the pop group Girls Aloud"

He might be innocent but surely thats not a normal sane man


Is it much different to people writing crime/horror novels, or to those who read them?


Yes. That fiction. This is fantasising about killing real people.
Author:  bobbdobbs [ Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Girls Aloud blog trial
veato wrote:
Linux_User wrote:
veato wrote:
"A former civil servant who wrote an internet article imagining the kidnap and murder of the pop group Girls Aloud"

He might be innocent but surely thats not a normal sane man


Is it much different to people writing crime/horror novels, or to those who read them?


Yes. That fiction. This is fantasising about killing real people.


yup lets start arresting people on what they think.. thought crimes!!!
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/