Author |
Message |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
Courtesy of PC Pro. This is so [LIFTED] ridiculous it beggars belief!
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:16 pm |
|
 |
HeatherKay
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 7262 Location: Here, but not all there.
|
You know, I wonder if every UK-based Twitterer and Facebooker started extensively making these kind of joke threats whether the entire security services would be so overloaded they'd implode.
To my mind it seems the only way we can begin to make a mockery of The Powers That Be. Then again, they're beginning to become a joke anyway, only they're too up their own backsides to notice.
_________________My Flickr | Snaptophobic BloggageHeather Kay: modelling details that matter. "Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:23 pm |
|
 |
Coref
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:20 pm Posts: 446 Location: ~/
|
I'm wondering if anyone reported him or if the powers that be are monitoring it. Although I couldn't imagine any jihadists announcing a forthcoming attack on Twitter or Facebook.
_________________ I was nickholway on the old boards.
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:44 pm |
|
 |
HeatherKay
Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 7262 Location: Here, but not all there.
|
Somebody grassed him up. Apparently the plod didn't even know what Twitter was - which I find difficult to believe, to be honest, even for the present state of the police in this country. It's worth reading the Independent article. Where's me links... Clickety
_________________My Flickr | Snaptophobic BloggageHeather Kay: modelling details that matter. "Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:47 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
There seems to be conflicting information about what Act he was arrested under. The Grauniad say it was the Criminal Law Act 1977. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/ja ... ter-arrest
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:50 pm |
|
 |
finlay666
Spends far too much time on here
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm Posts: 4876 Location: Newcastle
|
_________________TwitterCharlie Brooker: Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:00 pm |
|
 |
Angelic
Doesn't have much of a life
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:16 pm Posts: 704 Location: Leeds, UK
|
Uh oh... If we don't hear from you for a few days I guess this post is the reason ^_^
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:26 pm |
|
 |
LaptopAcidXperience
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 10:01 am Posts: 433 Location: Harrogate
|
Well at least something went right for him. This whole thing is ridiculous, I mean how come it took the black bastards a week to feel his collar, how can he be charged with conspiracy if no one else is involved, did twitter give up his personal information (if so was there a court order) not to mention the massive favour he'd be doing by actually blowing the airport up. Disgusting, arresting this guy is simply a misguided PR stunt by the filth.
_________________ get an iphone not a life.
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:02 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
Technically, everyone who read his tweet is 'involved'. I doubt even Plod would be mental enough to consider this a good idea as a publicity stunt. It is my experience (which is actually more than average) that plod's knowledge of tech is bordering on zero and that therefore he tends to over-react whenever it's involved. Add together the two things he fears most - technology and terrorism - and over-reaction is pretty much inevitable. Jon
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:22 pm |
|
 |
LaptopAcidXperience
Occasionally has a life
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 10:01 am Posts: 433 Location: Harrogate
|
That did cross my mind but surely it doesn't constitute conspiracy, if so, isn't everyone who read the post arrestable as well. Publicity stunt was the wrong use of phrase, I meant that they're sending a message that they can and will arrest people for pranks relating to terrorism, it makes them look like they're doing something because they can't catch the real terrorists. My other half (honestly I've got a girlfriend) has considerable professional experience of the police and she certainly bears out the statement that police know f**k all about technology, unless it's attached to their German machine guns.
_________________ get an iphone not a life.
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:38 pm |
|
 |
davrosG5
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am Posts: 6954 Location: Peebo
|

Whether or not the police were right to track this guy down is largely irrelevant. Anyone who thinks the police, airport security or the security services have even the smallest sense of humour where airports and bomb threats are concerned obviously hasn't been paying attention for the last 30 odd years. The guy is a moron for putting this on twitter.
The sad thing is of course that proper terrorists are somewhat unlikely to put something so blatant on the internet anywhere. Unfortunately the security services have to honour the threat because if they didn't and there was some sort of attack that had been notified there would ten kinds of hell to pay as a result. Carpet bombing twitter, facebook and the like with bomb threats just to see the reaction might be quite amusing for a short while but it would cause such an increase in the background noise MI5 and the like have to sift through that the probability of an actual attack would have to go up.
In summary, this is only a massive over-reaction by plod because the guy isn't a terrorist (yet anyway).
_________________ When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum. -Billy Connolly (to a heckler)
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:36 pm |
|
 |
jonbwfc
What's a life?
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm Posts: 17040
|
There hasn't been successful bomb attack on an airport in the last 30 years. There have been a tremendous number of false alarms and wacko plots that had no chance of success. There is definitely a point where paranoia overtakes practicality in security terms. And it would have taken all of 10 minutes to figure out the bloke was an idiot but certainly not a terrorist. yet they kept him in the cells/under interrogation for a considerable period of time and confiscated his property. If the public end up being more scared and resentful of the police than the terrorists, who has won? Given the evidence suggests they have absolutely no ability to appropriately filter information anyway, I can't see it will make much difference frankly. And slamming him in the clink and taking his stuff for such spurious reasons, is that going to make him more or less likely to become one? Jon
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:13 pm |
|
 |
davrosG5
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:37 am Posts: 6954 Location: Peebo
|
I didn't say there had been a totally successful attack on an airport. I said that anyone who hasn't noticed the police et al's total lack of a sense of humour where airports are concerned has been living under a rock for the last 30 odd years, is an idiot or possibly both. As for the success or otherwise of attempted attacks. Glasgow airport springs to mind. They didn't achieve their actual objective but they did do some damage to the building. Poor execution rather than an outright failure. You did read the bit in brackets at the end of my post right?
_________________ When they put teeth in your mouth, they spoiled a perfectly good bum. -Billy Connolly (to a heckler)
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:30 pm |
|
 |
JJW009
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:58 pm Posts: 8767 Location: behind the sofa
|
I concur. It's a bit like responding to "anything to declare?" with "Nothing except this bomb". You'd fully expect someone saying that to be detained and probed and charged with some kind of crime for being so stupid, not to mention insensitive. Fake bomb threats are and always have been a very serious crime, often causing as much chaos as a real attack. Blowing people up is not a laughing matter.
_________________jonbwfc's law: "In any forum thread someone will, no matter what the subject, mention Firefly." When you're feeling too silly for x404, youRwired.net
|
Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:44 pm |
|
 |
Linux_User
I haven't seen my friends in so long
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 7173
|
I'm sorry but the absolute worst that should have come out of this was "words of advice", a humorous Twitter post should not warrant this kind of attention.
There is also a clear difference between posting something on Twitter from the comfort of your own home and sparking a bomb threat via something said in person at an airport.
|
Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:13 am |
|
|