Reply to topic  [ 164 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 11  Next
What 'Stuff' You Got??? 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
John_Vella wrote:
I guess the main question would be is it worth trying to use my existing lenses with a new DSLR or would I be better selling the lot and starting from scratch?
Well he upgraded the body from a D40 and kept his existing lenses.

Mark


Does the fact that I don't have a DSLR, (the F65 is a film camera) make any difference? I realise that I'd probably have to use manual focus, and I think I might have answered my own question there but do you think it's worth keeping the lenses or just ditching them and buying some that are deisgned for a digital camera?

Using my limited knowledge of Nikon cameras, John, I think the key factor is whether your lenses have Autofocus motors built in to them, or whether they require the motor to be in the camera. If the former then the D5000 sounds fine, but if not you need a body with an AF motor in it, unless you only want to use manual focussing.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:51 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
If you like the lenses you have you could keep them, but would most likely have to choose a higher spec camera to use the AF. If you are happy to MF this may not be an issue.

As you've checked the value of the lenses on eBay, then if you decide to sell them off you have a couple of options. Buy the kit you want with a discount, or buy the kit and get a few extras, such as an extra lens, memory, batteries or a combination.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:53 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
do you think it's worth keeping the lenses or just ditching them and buying some that are deisgned for a digital camera?
Hmm, tough choice. I'm guessing you're looking at a body only prices, and only you know if you can stretch your budget to get a lens with the camera.
I think if I were you I'd try and ditch the manual focus lenses with the camera.
I don't know if this will help or hinder your decision making process but I have a lens that I could let you use as I very rarely use it and I wouldn't miss it at all.
I could take some shots with it on my mates D5000 so you can check them out if you like.

It's just an option.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:55 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
John_Vella wrote:
do you think it's worth keeping the lenses or just ditching them and buying some that are deisgned for a digital camera?
Hmm, tough choice. I'm guessing you're looking at a body only prices, and only you know if you can stretch your budget to get a lens with the camera.
I think if I were you I'd try and ditch the manual focus lenses with the camera.
I don't know if this will help or hinder your decision making process but I have a lens that I could let you use as I very rarely use it and I wouldn't miss it at all.
I could take some shots with it on my mates D5000 so you can check them out if you like.

It's just an option.

Mark


I like options! :D

If you could that would be great, thanks.

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:18 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
If you could that would be great, thanks.
Are you in a rush?
I'll likely not see him until Thursday next week.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:19 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
John_Vella wrote:
If you could that would be great, thanks.
Are you in a rush?
I'll likely not see him until Thursday next week.

Mark


Nope, no rush at all. :D

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:27 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
Having spoken to a nice man at Jacobs, it appears that the D5000 won't do auto focus, and I'd be better off getting the D90 body for about £450, which sounds like a plan to me... best get saving.

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:03 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
Having spoken to a nice man at Jacobs, it appears that the D5000 won't do auto focus, and I'd be better off getting the D90 body for about £450, which sounds like a plan to me... best get saving.


That sounds like a good price from what I've seen recently. Always good to see that you get a second opinion on the important things. ;)

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:39 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
I'd be better off getting the D90 body for about £450, which sounds like a plan to me...
So no need for test images on the D5000 then?

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:40 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
John_Vella wrote:
I'd be better off getting the D90 body for about £450, which sounds like a plan to me...
So no need for test images on the D5000 then?

Mark


As long as they weren't manual focus lenses they would come out the same within reason.

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:50 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
John_Vella wrote:
I'd be better off getting the D90 body for about £450, which sounds like a plan to me...
So no need for test images on the D5000 then?

Mark


Probably not, but thanks for the offer. It's always nice to know that there's a source of knowledge to fall back on :D

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:53 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
John_Vella wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
John_Vella wrote:
I'd be better off getting the D90 body for about £450, which sounds like a plan to me...
So no need for test images on the D5000 then?
Probably not, but thanks for the offer.
The lens is still available if required.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:00 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
Went into Jacobs with my Nikon F65 and two lenses and asked the guy there for his honest opinion - stick with Nikon, (D90) and use the lenses or start from scratch and get the Canon EOS500D. He advised the NIkon, as the larger of the two lenses would be great, apparently.

So that's what I've got. The Nikon D90, a £20 remote trigger thing and an 8GB SD Card.

Mark, as a point of interest what is the lens you were talking about and how much would you be wanting for it, (assuming that you want to sell it, of course)?

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:13 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:55 am
Posts: 7935
Location: Manchester.
Reply with quote
More stuff: Got a Cokin P120 Gradual Neutral Grey filter, a P filter holder and a 62mm adapter ring, (or adaptor ring) if you prefer the badly spelt label on the packaging.

:D

_________________
okenobi wrote:
John's hot. No denying it. But he's hardly Karen now, is he ;)

John Vella BSc (Hons), PGCE - Still the official forum prankster and crude remarker :P
Sorry :roll:
I'll behave now.
Promise ;)


Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:23 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 1598
Location: Right here...... Right now.......
Reply with quote
A few weeks ago I bought a second-hand battery grip to go with my second 40D. The old one was going to cost a minumum of £60 to repair myself using bits purchased worldwide but the DVDC (Dangerous Volcano Dust Cloud) has put paid to any hope of getting stuff shipped from abroad so I bought another one second hand for £70 :D

Al

_________________
Eternally optimistic in a 'glass half empty' sort of way....


Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:37 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 164 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 11  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.