Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Graduated ND filters 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
I've been looking at filters and stuff.

I like taking landscape pictures but have come across the problem of contrast caused by the bright sky when compared to the dark foreground.

What is the difference between using a graduated ND filter to compensate for this and using photoshop / GIMP to cut a paste the two halves of differently exposed photos?

Apart from the fact that my photoshop skills are lacking greatly and it would look very poor if I tried to do that.

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Mon May 18, 2009 2:13 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
You can rest at night knowing you got the image on the day, and not constructing it in Photoshop. ;)

Get a grad ND. Everyone should have one.
This and this were the products of an ND grad - I'm not sure if I'd be able to construct something like it in P.shop.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Mon May 18, 2009 2:29 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
You can rest at night knowing you got the image on the day, and not constructing it in Photoshop. ;)
That's a good point actually.

I'm a fan of "what comes out of the camera stays" photography.

Although I do make a few minor tweaks in iPhoto.

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Mon May 18, 2009 2:40 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
Aside from the peace of mind of knowing you got it right first time, you also benefit from a better dynamic range in the area that's been darkened. When you darken part of the image in PS or Lightroom afterwards, you get odd effects if the highlights are saturated at all, where you see can grey areas where the blue of the sky (say) near the sun has been clipped to white, losing the colour, and then brought back down in post-processing. I'll see if I can dig out an example when I get home.

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon May 18, 2009 3:33 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
nickminers wrote:
you get odd effects if the highlights are saturated at all
This image was overexposed in-camera and pulled back in Lightroom.
I've added no colourisation to this image at all.
Image

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon May 18, 2009 3:38 pm
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
A perfect example. Thanks Mark! And a beatifully composed shot, I might add. Even if it was overexposed :)

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon May 18, 2009 3:42 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
nickminers wrote:
you get odd effects if the highlights are saturated at all
This image was overexposed in-camera and pulled back in Lightroom.
I've added no colourisation to this image at all.
Image

Mark


Nice image. How over-exposed was it? Were the clouds completely blown out?

_________________
G.


Mon May 18, 2009 4:05 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
Thinking about Timark's shot.

Is it possible to use 2 filters?

i.e. use a 3 stop filter to get the flowing water exposed correctly and smooth and then a graduated ND filter so that the sky isn't over exposed?

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Mon May 18, 2009 4:09 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
I think I need a graduated filter for my DSLR. Are these similar in construction to my polariser? This filter can be rotated on the lens so that the angle of polarisation can be adjusted.

EDIT:

Here’s a picture which really could have benefitted from one of these filters, I think:

Image

As it stands, it’s under exposed at the bottom and over exposed at the top. I’ve pulled the settings around in Aperture so that some detail from the top comes back, but the bottom reflection is a bit too dark for my liking.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon May 18, 2009 4:13 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
Fogmeister wrote:
Is it possible to use 2 filters?

i.e. use a 3 stop filter to get the flowing water exposed correctly and smooth and then a graduated ND filter so that the sky isn't over exposed?

Yes. The holder for mine can take (I think, off them top of my head) 3.

Edd

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Mon May 18, 2009 5:12 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
I think I need a graduated filter for my DSLR. Are these similar in construction to my polariser? This filter can be rotated on the lens so that the angle of polarisation can be adjusted.


No, they are rectangular in construction and fit into a holder so that the 'horizon' can be adjusted vertically as well as rotated. I think you can get screw-on ND grads but you wouldn't be able to adjust the horizon.

paulzolo wrote:
Here’s a picture which really could have benefitted from one of these filters, I think:

Image

As it stands, it’s under exposed at the bottom and over exposed at the top. I’ve pulled the settings around in Aperture so that some detail from the top comes back, but the bottom reflection is a bit too dark for my liking.

Yes, you could use spot metering to work out how many stops difference there are between the image and the reflection, and use an ND grad with the same number of stops.

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon May 18, 2009 5:48 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
nickminers wrote:
I think you can get screw-on ND grads but you wouldn't be able to adjust the horizon.


I use a screw in ND grad, and yes, like a polariser, you can adjust the filters horizon.
It's a bit of a nuisance twiddling the polariser to get the effect you want, then adjusting the ND Grad while taking care not to disturb the polariser, but worth it.
I've a yellow grad for B&W film that's got a handy little handle on the rim of the filter. Much easier to use.

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Mon May 18, 2009 5:59 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
Alex - can you move the horizon laterally as well as rotating it?

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon May 18, 2009 6:27 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
Ah I see what you mean now - no, that's the disadvantage. The horizon on a screw in is always going to be ~50% down the filter. The Cokin/Lee filter holder systems would be a much better investment in that regard. :)

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Mon May 18, 2009 6:30 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
Ah I see what you mean now - no, that's the disadvantage. The horizon on a screw in is always going to be ~50% down the filter. The Cokin/Lee filter holder systems would be a much better investment in that regard. :)


I’m glad that one has been answered for me. Thanks all. It will be the square type when I get some then.

Nick - the photo I showed was taken on my little Leica, and at the moment I don’t have any means of attaching a filter to it. I do understand the principles you explained. If I get the square types of filters, I could manually hold them in front of the lens, I suppose.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon May 18, 2009 7:09 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.