Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Oops 

Risk it?
Yes 25%  25%  [ 1 ]
No 75%  75%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 4

Oops 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Ok so I lost one of my batteries. After tearing the house apart without luck I decided to retrace my steps since I last definitely had it. Checked the car, no luck. Checked the woods around the house, no luck. Checked around the garden, result!

So I lost the battery when out taking pictures of the snow. It has been in the snow for 5 days or so, thawed/frozen several times, rained on, and exposed to direct albeit weak sunlight. The protective cover was on and upwards, meaning the terminals were somewhat protected from standing water, the terminals are not corroded in anyway.

After leaving it to dry in the house for several days I decided to risk putting it on the charger. It charged for 5-10 seconds and then suggested it was fully charged, not that much of a surprise as the very last thing before I lost it was to charge it.

So everything appears to be in my favour, but do I risk it in the camera? It is not a Nikon original.

My instincts say yes, do it. But if many people are against then I may reconsider. :lol:

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:04 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
If the battery is dry, the very worst that will happen is it won't hold a charge. I doubt it'll explode or anything spectacular.

I say go for it.

(Usual disclaimers...)

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:11 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
I say go for it.

(Usual disclaimers...)
+1
I also say take better care of your equipment. (8+)

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:13 pm
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 638
Location: 3959 miles from the centre of the Earth - give or take a bit
Reply with quote
Have you got access to a multimeter or know someone who has, then you could quickly check to see if the voltage is what it should be and none of the cells inside have been damaged.

_________________
i7 860 @ 3.5GHz, GTX275, 4GB DDR3


Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:36 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
*Electronics Engineer hat on*

Without access to an oscilloscope and simulated load you cannot test it effectively.

HeatherKay wrote:
If the battery is dry, the very worst that will happen is it won't hold a charge.

No, the worst that will happen is that it spikes and destroys the camera.

There are very many ways in which that battery could do lasting damage to your camera without doing anything spectacular. Take it for recycling and get another - it's just not worth it.

_________________
Jim

Image


Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:57 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
There are very many ways in which that battery could do lasting damage to your camera without doing anything spectacular. Take it for recycling and get another - it's just not worth it.
There you go then. A costly mistake hopefully avoided.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:40 pm
Profile WWW
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
rustybucket wrote:
No, the worst that will happen is that it spikes and destroys the camera.


See? What do I know?

Take the man's advice, and ignore mine. I'd have tried the battery in my camera and there would now be gnashing of teeth and wailing in the HK household.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:48 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 1598
Location: Right here...... Right now.......
Reply with quote
Good info Jim Image Image Image

I would have been in the 'stick it in the camera and give it a go' camp :oops:

Fortunately, I have a battery grip and there has only been a few occasions where I've needed to change batteries :D

Al

_________________
Eternally optimistic in a 'glass half empty' sort of way....


Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:01 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
:shock:

I was useful.....

Yay! :lol:

_________________
Jim

Image


Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:27 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 175
Reply with quote
Thanks for the warning. I use Nikon and would have tried the battery; I won't do that if I ever have a similar situation.


Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:26 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:33 pm
Posts: 491
Location: UK, England.
Reply with quote
Try the battery in a cheaper camera/item?

_________________
Twitter: AdamW89
Flickr: The Hobgob

Nietzsche wrote:
Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.


Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:34 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
I haven't checked but would have thought the battery fitted only in what I would consider the too expensive to test range. Also my initial reaction would have been to try it, just like many of the responses on here, but rusty's singular comment has persuaded me otherwise.

It just isn't worth the risk, especially when my warranty is Singapore based. :lol:

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:23 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 12 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.