Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Canon’s DSLR naming.… 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
I dunno, but to me it’s confusing. There is a logic, but it falls over badly.

So, we have: ESO300D, 350D, 400D etc - the “hundred” line is clearly consumer, entry level kit. I get that.

Then we have the EOS 30D, 40D etc - the “tens” which are not full frame DSLRs, but are more advanced, and more “pro” than “am”.

Then the EOS 4D, 5D, 5D MkII - full frame, professional level cameras, with prices to match.

So... where does the EOS 7D fall in all this? It’s not full frame, so in my eyes it doesn’t fit with the 5D line. It’s more in the 40/50D line. It doesn’t make sense to me.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:23 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Canon's website currently shows the range as this:

EOS 1000D
EOS 450D
EOS 500D
EOS 50D
EOS 7D
EOS 5D Mark II
EOS-1D Mark IV - DEC 09
EOS-1Ds Mark III

I'm not saying it makes any sense but when have companies been known to make things easy for us!

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:16 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
The way I see it, the xxxD series is the standard entry level, with xxxxD being a reduced entry level. Then there's the xxD which is a step up. From then on you have a choice between a faster burst-rate or a more pricey but higher IQ full-frame version, with the 5DII and 7D, and the top-end pro 1D and IDs.

Personally I see the xxD series as pretty redundant, as you'd be barking not to get a 7D for a bit more, and the xxxxD seems to exist just to offer an option to match Nikon's slightly-cheaper-than-an-xxxD entry level model, and is just a crippled xxxD.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:29 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
Well if you think that's confusing (as far as I can tell, with a few exceptions, the lower the number, the better the camera), could someone explain Nikon's system?

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:43 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 5288
Location: ln -s /London ~
Reply with quote
nickminers wrote:
Well if you think that's confusing (as far as I can tell, with a few exceptions, the lower the number, the better the camera), could someone explain Nikon's system?

No.

_________________
timark_uk wrote:
Gay sex is better than no sex

timark_uk wrote:
Edward Armitage is Awesome. Yes, that's right. Awesome with a A.


Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:45 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Thats a mess right? Their 'professional' range is...

D3X
D3S
D3

So good so far then as far as the top of the range goes. Then....

D300S
D300

At the bottom of the pro range. Thats ok too, I get that. But just to throw a spanner in the works there's the D700 sitting right in the middle.

D3X - FX 24mp
D3S - FX 12mp and video
D3 - FX 12mp
D700 - FX 12mp
D300S -DX 12mp and video
D300 - DX 12mp

Although looking similar in sensor spec to the D3 the D700 doesnt have the portrait handle/battery grip layout as the D3. Its like the anomoly in the range lol

As for the consumer spec models I havent got a bleeding clue (as listed in order on Nikon website)...

D90
D5000
D3000
D60

?????

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:05 am
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:37 pm
Posts: 835
Location: North Wales UK
Reply with quote
I started considering Nikon and gave up trying to figure out their numbering. Canon have got a bit confusing but are nowhere near as bad.

_________________
My lowest spec operational system- AT desktop case, 200W AT PSU, Jetway TX98B Socket 7, Intel Pentium 75Mhz, 2x16MB EDO RAM, 270MB Quantum Maverick HDD, ATI Rage II+ graphics, Soundblaster 16 CT2230, MS-DOS/Win 3.11

My Flickr


Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:59 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 7 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.