Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
The Zone System 
Author Message
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
OK, been reading about this, and I get the theory and a bit of the practice, but my mind is asking that dreadful question: “why?”

If we take Nick’s woodland scene, he is saying that I should adjust the exposure so that it’s at 0 in the camera’s exposure meter. The grass is correctly exposed, and the trees are further pushed into shadow by this. and, yes, you get a good picture. I get that. It’s what I do when shooting on manual (which I have to admit is not very often).

What I don’t fully get is the reason to step down. At this point, I remember that we used to overdive or underdrive at uni film by telling the camera a different ISO number to what film was rated at. The reasons for this are hazy, but a have a feeling that it’s related. We can’t overdrive or underdrive a digital camera - tell it top use ISO200, and you get that sensitivity.

So, let’s take a scenario where I am taking a picture of an object in shadow. Using a modern camera, I would set the exposure on the camera to be at position 0. Back in the say, I would be shooting on a manual SLR with the film ISO and camera ISO settings out of kilter (I must email old photography tutor to ask for a reminder on that) That is properly exposed. But the Zone System tells me I should step down by one or two stops. I suppose I have to try this, but I am not sure that stepping down will be beneficial as the object in shadow would fail to be exposed satisfactorily.

On a separate, but connected note. If I shoot in RAW, and I correctly expose the object in shadow (ie it’s at position 0), could I use software like Aperture to “re zone” the picture and retain the image fidelity? I know this is seen as heresy by some (little sister included), but I do believe that what comes out of the camera is the start of a process, not the end of it.

I have to point out that I am probably using this system when I shoot manually, but have not had it explained in a formal way. I can get mightily confused when this happens, as I tend to start to think of what I am already doing as “wrong” rather than see it as added information.

I must experiment a more with my camera to see results.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sun May 10, 2009 10:41 pm
Profile
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
Paul - the first thing to point out is that it is not telling you what you 'should' do at all. It's merely telling you how to achieve certain results.

The second thing to make clear is that you need to use spot metering to use the zone system effectively. When you mentioned the woodland scene, you omitted to mention that I took a reading from the sunlit patch of grass before setting the exposure - if I'f set the camera to 0 for the whole scene, the second picture would be the likely result.

In your film camera example, setting the camera's ISO out of line with the film rating is just another way of achieving the same effect. Telling the camera you're using ISO 400 with ISO 100 film will always underexpose by 2 stops, which is the same as telling the camera you're using ISO 100 and using a four times faster shutter speed that the camera suggests. Re-rating the film will effectively shift the correlation between camera meter and zone in the first diagram in my article, so that in the example above (ISO 400 with ISO 100 film) 0 would correspond to zone 3, not 5. It is precisely because you cannot re-rate a digital camera that you have to make these adjustments manually.

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon May 11, 2009 6:06 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 6580
Location: Getting there
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
On a separate, but connected note. If I shoot in RAW, and I correctly expose the object in shadow (ie it’s at position 0), could I use software like Aperture to “re zone” the picture and retain the image fidelity? I know this is seen as heresy by some (little sister included), but I do believe that what comes out of the camera is the start of a process, not the end of it.

This is the part that I was getting confused with I think.

If you had a picture with a shaded area in it and you exposed to 0 according to the shaded region then the rest of the picture would be over exposed.

The zone system says that to correctly expose the picture you should set the exposure to be too dark (i.e. -2 or something) for the shaded area. That way the picture will be correctly exposed for the lighter areas.

_________________
Oliver Foggin - iPhone Dev

JJW009 wrote:
The count will go up until they stop counting. That's the way counting works.


Doodle Sub!
Game Of Life

Image Image


Mon May 11, 2009 9:16 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
sounds like something I need to try too? :cry: I dont even know how to activate it on D80 :cry:

_________________
Image


Mon May 11, 2009 9:47 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
brataccas wrote:
I dont even know how to activate it on D80 :cry:


There's this concept known as "reading". Words flow past your eyes and your brain absorbs the information they give.

In other words, dig out your camera's user manual, assuming it was a printed one, or look it up on the PDF that came on the software CD.

You may find it enlightening. I do. ;)

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Mon May 11, 2009 10:04 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
There's this concept known as "reading". Words flow past your eyes and your brain absorbs the information they give.
Pedantically speaking, your eyes move past the words, unless you're reading a ticker-tape.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon May 11, 2009 10:29 am
Profile WWW
Doesn't have much of a life

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 638
Location: 3959 miles from the centre of the Earth - give or take a bit
Reply with quote
I cheat - the Sony has the facility to take three pictures with either +/- 0.3Ev or 0.7Ev. However, the 40-zone metering system always seems to work pretty well.

_________________
i7 860 @ 3.5GHz, GTX275, 4GB DDR3


Mon May 11, 2009 10:30 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
dogbert10 wrote:
I cheat - the Sony has the facility to take three pictures with either +/- 0.3Ev or 0.7Ev.
Ah yes, bracketing. Mine can do that too, though I've never actually used it.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon May 11, 2009 10:32 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
Ok - got a rather confusing reply from ex photography teacher. He gets enthusiastic, and words seem to flow faster than brain can order them. He can also get very technical - he’s been doing photography for decades.

Point 1 - over driving or under driving films is achieving pretty much as the zone system. He says to expose for the shadows, process for the highlights. He also seems to think that you can achieve some of this using RAW - I guess he sees RAW in the same light as printing from a negative.

Point 2 - more of an aside really - in the USA, digital photography is not seen a “fine” photography because of detail resolution - he says that this will change. Digital does not seem to meet the needs of a lot of the fine photography community there.

In essence, it seems that reading about the the Zone system is formalising and hopefully re-organising a lot of loosely floating information in my head. I can only think that experimentation is going to be the key for this, not a lot of theoretical chatter.

This is all very interesting, and hopefully helpful. I will have to extract the RAW files from the Barbican from Aperture and run them through the rather horrid software that Leica supplied to see what can be done there. I do wish Apple would catch up.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Mon May 11, 2009 10:42 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
ive lost all my manuals :cry:

_________________
Image


Mon May 11, 2009 10:56 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
brataccas wrote:
ive lost all my manuals :cry:
http://www.nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/noprint/D80_noprint.pdf

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon May 11, 2009 10:58 am
Profile WWW
Occasionally has a life

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 292
Location: UK
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
brataccas wrote:
ive lost all my manuals :cry:
http://www.nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/noprint/D80_noprint.pdf

Mark

Page 52

_________________
New site - shop now open!

Image


Mon May 11, 2009 11:18 am
Profile WWW
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
nickminers wrote:
timark_uk wrote:
brataccas wrote:
ive lost all my manuals :cry:
http://www.nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/noprint/D80_noprint.pdf
Page 52
*laugh*
Just how helpful are we.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Mon May 11, 2009 11:20 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Scotland
Reply with quote
very :shock:

_________________
Image


Mon May 11, 2009 11:38 am
Profile
Doesn't have much of a life
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 1899
Reply with quote
My camera does not have spot metering so I won't be getting the best out of this when I try it out.

_________________
Image

My Flickr Page

Now with added ball and chain.


Mon May 11, 2009 1:01 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.