Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
International Film Buying Day 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:11 pm
Posts: 12143
Location: Belfast
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
Fine Art photography has yet to accept digital cameras.
Their loss.

Mark

_________________
okenobi wrote:
All I know so far is that Mark, Jimmy Olsen and Peter Parker use Nikon and everybody else seems to use Canon.
ShockWaffle wrote:
Well you obviously. You're a one man vortex of despair.


Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:19 pm
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
timark_uk wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
Fine Art photography has yet to accept digital cameras.
Their loss.

Mark


There are some fine art photographers using digital, but especially in the USA, it’s not got the foothold that it has in other areas. I think it’s because of the longevity of the medium, the value of attaching a negative to a camera and a photographer. It’s to do with the provenance of the image.

Heather's comments about the grain of film photography is one I agree with. Even though I use digital, I do like to rough the images up by running them through some filters in Photosop. I tend to use Alien Skin’s Exposure, because I like the results. I can not say whether the GAFF filter is 100% accurate or true to the original film stock, but I like the effect. Much to my sister’s annoyance, I’ll happily “ruin” my crisp digital images by doing things to them in Photoshop. The RAW file is my negative, and I learned very quickly at uni that the negative is the start - you can do all kinds of things in a dark room. Photoshop is no different in this respect.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:42 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
I'd love for someone to come up with a proper grain adding filter for Aperture/Lightroom. I don't want to have to export to Photoshop for that kind of effect.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:44 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
:)
Then why not simply shoot on film in the first place?
<devil's advocate, of course ;)>

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:46 pm
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
I'd love for someone to come up with a proper grain adding filter for Aperture/Lightroom. I don't want to have to export to Photoshop for that kind of effect.


Even filters which do work in Aperture cause the image to be taken out of the usual adjustment layer. You have to use the Edit With> menu, and an editable copy is made. You can’t layer effects on the image in the way that you can do with adjustments. What is needed is an architecture close to Photoshop’s smart objects where filters can be applied, but without affecting the original image data.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:43 pm
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
ProfessorF wrote:
:)
Then why not simply shoot on film in the first place?
<devil's advocate, of course ;)>


;)

I've moved on to digital. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages for me.

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:40 am
Profile
Occasionally has a life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:58 am
Posts: 188
Reply with quote
I can't see myself going back to film except as a curiosity once in a while. I took a long time to be convinced about digital, but now the convenience of it wins out over any drawbacks. The biggest advantage for me is not being constrained by film speed as I shoot mostly handheld and with available light.

No longer do I find myself unable to take a shot because the conditions have changed so much that the nice slow film I put in the camera that morning is next to useless.


Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:29 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.