Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
When the image hits the negative (pics!!) 
Author Message
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
....is it upside down?

Seriously, am I being stupid? I thought, possibly incorrectly, that as light passes through the lens it is flipped on it's head. Of course in an SLR the prism sorts that out in the viewfinder but does that mean the image on the negative is upside down?

I only as as I'm going to create a mask for one of my Lomo cameras with the work PHOTO or something and place it in front of the negative. I'm trying to get my head around which way up the word needs to be.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Last edited by veato on Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:02 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Ok, after tweets from forum users I'm thinking this is the way the mask will need to be aligned (the word "photo") so that when the film is developed it appears the right way up/around?

Image

Thoughts?

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:25 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:26 pm
Posts: 17040
Reply with quote
Depends what the background to the photo is really doesn't it? If it's the mask to a plain background, you can just flip the print around and you don't need to worry about it.

Jon


Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:32 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
Fix it in post. :lol:

Holding a negative in front of me, in the same orientation as it will be in the camera when the image is exposed, the emulsion side is away from me and the image is inverted. If you want a mask to produce a word on the emulsion side, it too has to be inverted. I think that's all you need to do.

I did think it also had to be mirrored, but now I have a physical sample in front of me, and have ingested some caffeine, I was mistaken. ;)

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:54 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 12030
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
Fix it in post. :lol:

Holding a negative in front of me, in the same orientation as it will be in the camera when the image is exposed, the emulsion side is away from me and the image is inverted. If you want a mask to produce a word on the emulsion side, it too has to be inverted. I think that's all you need to do.

I did think it also had to be mirrored, but now I have a physical sample in front of me, and have ingested some caffeine, I was mistaken. ;)


I'd go with this.
I'm also interested in seeing the final result!

_________________
www.alexsmall.co.uk

Charlie Brooker wrote:
Windows works for me. But I'd never recommend it to anybody else, ever.


Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:59 am
Profile
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
I did think it also had to be mirrored, but now I have a physical sample in front of me, and have ingested some caffeine, I was mistaken. ;)


Sure? How are you holding the negative to look at it? My thoughts are that it will be inverted and mirrored. The lens is a circular thing and affects light rays in all directions, so if it is sending light from the top of the scene to the bottom of the negative, then it goes that stuff to the right will end up on the left of the negative. Unless the lens is magical in some fashion (and thusly expensive).

This is where experimentation will bear fruit.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:14 am
Profile
Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:13 pm
Posts: 7262
Location: Here, but not all there.
Reply with quote
paulzolo wrote:
HeatherKay wrote:
I did think it also had to be mirrored, but now I have a physical sample in front of me, and have ingested some caffeine, I was mistaken. ;)


Sure?


Nope. :lol:

_________________
My Flickr | Snaptophobic Bloggage
Heather Kay: modelling details that matter.
"Let my windows be open to receive new ideas but let me also be strong enough not to be blown away by them." - Mahatma Gandhi.


Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:15 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Right then, I've had another look at one of my developed negs and combining that with the power of wiki (!!) I feel pretty sure the word as it is in the image (2nd post) will come out the right way up. I'm going to make the mask today and if some sun comes out go out for a play!

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:20 am
Profile WWW
What's a life?
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:27 pm
Posts: 12251
Reply with quote
HeatherKay wrote:
paulzolo wrote:
HeatherKay wrote:
I did think it also had to be mirrored, but now I have a physical sample in front of me, and have ingested some caffeine, I was mistaken. ;)


Sure?


Nope. :lol:


If you are holding the negative the way it sits in the camera (i.e. emulsion away from you), you are correcting the horizontal mirroring by effectively looking at the image from behind.

All this does give headaches. You are inverting everything with a negative - the view, colours, etc..

Your best bet is to experiment - make a mask, run some film through, have it processed and see if it works. If not, try again with a different alignment. Remember way works before embarking on the project for real.

_________________
All the best,
Paul
brataccas wrote:
your posts are just combo chains of funny win

I’m on Twitter, tweeting away... My Photos Random Avatar Explanation


Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:43 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
I think I might have a Kodak Gold 24exp in the fridge. I could run that through and see what happens.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:23 am
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Partial success!

I was right about the word. It had to be inverted both horizontally and vertically like my illustration further up in the thread. Once I'd done that the word came out the right way up/around on the photos.

I ran into a problem though. I wanted to print the word on acetate (as I'm useless with a pen) but realised it's not completely see through which would have affected the image. To avoid this I cut out the word but that in itself means every bad edge shows up. Also there is some light leakage through the black print.

My next challenge is to try the same but print on photo paper/card to block out more light and to try and get the cuts cleaner.

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:21 pm
Profile WWW
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 5836
Reply with quote
veato wrote:
It had to be inverted both horizontally and vertically

I prefer to rotate it through 180° about the normal

;)

_________________
Jim

Image


Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:33 pm
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:16 am
Posts: 6146
Location: Middle Earth
Reply with quote
Have you considered using images rather than text?

Straight edges may not be as troublesome. ;)

_________________
Dive like a fish, drink like a fish!

><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>
•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><(((º>

If one is diving so close to the limits that +/- 1% will make a difference then the error has already been made.


Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:08 am
Profile
I haven't seen my friends in so long
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:17 am
Posts: 5550
Location: Nottingham
Reply with quote
Yes but I fancied having a play with words. I just like to experiment with my film/lomo stuff.

_________________
Twitter
Blog
flickr


Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:01 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.